Filter by category
- Congress
- Constitution
- Court Decisions
- Crypto
- DEI
- DOJ
- Dynamis
- FCPA
- Federal Fraud laws
- Howey Test
- Legal Analysis
- Legislation
- Obstruction
- SEC
- Securities
- Statutes
- Trump
- Whistleblower
- antitrust
- assets
- corporate resolutions
- florida
- health care
- international
- massachusetts
- money laundering
- new york
- white-collar defense
- wire fraud
US v. Alladawi: New Ciminelli wire fraud decision
New case alert: US v. Alladawi - a case incorporating the Ciminelli right-to-control theory to find a defendant not guilty.
Understanding Materiality in Securities Fraud
Title 18 Section 1348 “Materiality” Standard as compared with Title 15 securities fraud cases.
US v. Milheiser - 9th Circuit Wire Fraud Decision
The 9th Circuit last week released its opinion in United States v. Milheiser, 16-CR-00076, in which the Court overturned six convictions of defendants who had been convicted of mail fraud and conspiracy to commit mail fraud arising from the defendants’ sales companies’ aggressive tactics in selling printer toner. The 9th Circuit adopted the “benefit of the bargain” theory of wire fraud, under which individuals cannot be convicted of wire fraud if the alleged victims received the “benefit of the bargain,” even if they were induced to make a purchase through misrepresentations.
Navigating the Biden Blueprint for the Crypto Industry
The Biden Administration has added a host of known and unknown policy changes related to crypto. This blog post explores some of the most prominent changes.
Materiality Standards: Comparing SEC and Federal Fraud Laws
Prosecutors frequently argue that 18 USC 1348 (Title 18 securities fraud) has a lower materiality standard than Title 15 securities fraud (10b-5). This blog post argues that there is little reason for courts to impose a lower materiality standard for the same conduct.
Dynamis Continues to help victims of crypto-based fraud
Dynamis fights on behalf of victims of “big butchering” in the crypto space - this time taking on Binance.
Motion to Stay Dismissal of Indictment: Denied
Dynamis attorney Eric Rosen defeated the DOJ in a motion to dismiss the Indictment in the “Atlas Trading” case
Dynamis Secures Dismissal in “Atlas Trading” Stock Fraud Case
Dynamis attorneys secured the dismissal of the Indictment in the "Atlas Trading" securities fraud case in the Southern District of Texas. Dynamis attorneys drafted the briefs and led the fight to obtain dismissal of the Indictment.
Dynamis Files Antitrust Lawsuit Against Activision
Landmark antitrust lawsuit by Hector Rodriguez and Seth Abner “Scump” against Activision.
Howey Test Implications for Crypto Decisions
For years, courts viewed the “Howey” test as clear guidance as to whether a particular asset or investment was a security. Now, recent inconsistent decisions, particularly in the crypto space, have questioned that clear guidance. The effect is a rekindling the debate as to whether the term “investment contract” is void for vagueness because it fails to give people and businesses a reasonable answer as to what is or is not a security.
New Crypto Tax Rules: Dynamis Quick Take
Dynamis LLP analysis of crypto tax rules affecting businesses in 2023.
Exploring Crypto Terminology: Your Complete Cheat Sheet
Decentralized Finance (DeFi): The overall ecosystem of crypto-currency and blockchain. DeFi is a response to issues with centralized financial exchanges (banks, brokerages, etc.) and uses the new technologies of crypto and blockchain to remove third party intermediaries. It allows for direct peer-to-peer financial transactions.
Decrypting The Digital Asset Anti-Money Laundering Act
Overview of the 2023 Digital Asset Money Laundering Act - crypto legislation
Utilizing 28 U.S.C. § 1782 for International Crypto Cases
Blog post which argues that 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Could Be a Powerful Tool for International Crypto Litigation
The “Howey” test and the Term “Investment Contract”
For years, courts viewed the “Howey” test as clear guidance as to whether a particular asset or investment was a security. Now, recent inconsistent decisions, particularly in the crypto space, have questioned that clear guidance. The effect is a rekindling the debate as to whether the term “investment contract” is void for vagueness because it fails to give people and businesses a reasonable answer as to what is or is not a security.
New Federal Legislation Criminalizes Demand Side of Bribery
The Foreign Extortion prevention Act ("FEPA" or the "Act") was passed as part of the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act ("NDAA"), was passed in Congress with bipartisan support and signed into law by President Biden. FEPA is the first U.S. regulation intended to regulate the "demand side" of foreign bribery--creating a direct criminal statute against foreign officials who solicit or accept bribes from a company or individual in the U.S.
New Year, New Legislation: New York, Massachusetts & Florida
It is critical to keep up with the most recent legislative developments in law. Three states—New York, Massachusetts, and Florida—have enacted a plethora of new legislation that will affect individuals, companies, and communities as we enter 2024. This year is bringing with it a flurry of legislative modifications that need attention, from major tax cuts to workers' rights improvements. Below are a few of the highlights:
5 Crypto Decisions From 2023 Every Lawyer Should Know
Tired of hearing about Ripple and Coinbase’s battles with the SEC? Here are five opinions from courts around the country that will shape crypto laws going forward.