Blog post which argues that 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Could Be a Powerful Tool for International Crypto Litigation

For years, courts viewed the “Howey” test as clear guidance as to whether a particular asset or investment was a security. Now, recent inconsistent decisions, particularly in the crypto space, have questioned that clear guidance. The effect is a rekindling the debate as to whether the term “investment contract” is void for vagueness because it fails to give people and businesses a reasonable answer as to what is or is not a security.

Tired of hearing about Ripple and Coinbase’s battles with the SEC? Here are five opinions from courts around the country that will shape crypto laws going forward.

Read Dynamis’ analysis as to whether the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”) applies to crypto transfers.