The Genius ACT: Regulation for Stablecoins has Passed the Senate
The GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act) is legislation introduced in the 119th U.S. Congress aimed at establishing clear rules for stablecoin issuance and operation within the United States. Here's a detailed breakdown of the Act:
Key Provisions:
Authorized Issuers:
Stablecoins can only be issued by entities designated as insured banks, credit unions, federally-qualified issuers, or state-qualified issuers. This limits issuance to institutions that can meet certain regulatory and financial standards.
Mandatory Reserves:
This is the most important provision. Issuers must hold reserves equivalent to 100% of outstanding stablecoins, backed by cash or high-quality liquid assets like U.S. Treasury securities.
Transparency Requirements:
Issuers must publish monthly audits detailing their reserve holdings and explicitly outline their redemption processes.
Regulatory Oversight:
Provides a dual regulatory structure, allowing issuers to choose between federal or certified state oversight. State regulation applies only to issuers with less than $10 billion in stablecoins outstanding. Federal regulation is exclusively in the hands of the Comptroller of the Currency.
AML and Compliance:
Issuers are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring strict anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions compliance.
Foreign Issuers:
Foreign entities can participate in U.S. stablecoin markets if their regulatory framework is certified as equivalent by the U.S. Treasury and they commit to compliance with U.S. legal requirements.
Legal Status of Stablecoins:
Importantly, stablecoins meeting these criteria are explicitly defined as non-securities, preventing the SEC from exercising jurisdiction.
Penalties for Unauthorized Issuance:
Significant penalties include fines of up to $1 million and imprisonment for up to five years per violation for unauthorized stablecoin issuance.
Potential Problems and Concerns:
Barrier to Entry:
The stringent issuer criteria could favor large institutions, potentially stifling innovation by preventing smaller fintech startups from participating.
Centralization Risks:
The Act may unintentionally lead to market centralization by limiting issuers primarily to existing large banks and institutions.
International Coordination:
Requiring Treasury certification for foreign issuers may complicate cross-border cooperation, leading to potential international friction.
Implementation Challenges:
The strict reserve requirements and frequent audits will increase operational costs, potentially reducing the efficiency and attractiveness of stablecoins.
State vs. Federal Regulation:
Dual oversight between state and federal agences could create regulatory complexity or inconsistencies, potentially confusing issuers and consumers about which standards apply.
Ambiguity in Emergencies:
While provisions exist for emergencies, the Act does not clearly define how swiftly and flexibly these provisions can be enacted, potentially leading to uncertainty during crises.
Conclusion:
The GENIUS Act establishes needed regulatory clarity and protective measures for stablecoin markets. However, concerns around centralization, regulatory complexity, and barriers to market entry will pose challenges. Stay tuned for how this Act will be implemented in practice.